z a m h e i f a

 

zamheifa (bavarian): to cooperate, mutual aid

about zamheifa

zamheifa (bavarian: to cooperate, mutual aid) is a collection of notes and results on economic theory and analysis from a libertarian socialist point of view.

Currently there are results from two major lines of work:

  • analysis of data / stylised facts and development of a basic model for growth, business cycles and structural change (transition from the fordist to the neoliberal growth regime in the 1970ies/80ies). [→ growth, cycles and crises]
  • analysis of long-term evolution (since the 1960ies) of the distribution of income, with the focus on the four Western-European countries France, Germany, Italy and Spain [→ distribution of income, wealth and power]

zamheifa is a personal web page, the presented results and analyses are fruit of my personal research done in my free time, as an auto-didact in the economics profession, presented to the interested public in the hope that You may find some interesting ideas or data collections helpful either for related research and studies or for political work.

The intention is to be as scientifically rigorous as possible with the limited available time and resources (without support of an academic institution or funding behind).

Some observations on the long term evolution of the distribution of income:

  • since the transition from fordist growth regime to neoliberalism around 1980 there is a substantial change in primary distribution of income towards a growing share of capital income with respect to labour income (wages), from an adjusted wage share of 70 – 75 % in Western Europe in 1980 to 60 – 65 % in 2015, a loss of almost 10% of GDP.
  • while in 1980 almost all of capital income corresponded to a similar share of gross investment, in 2012 there is a share of capital income corresponding to 10 – 15 % of GDP with is not invested in the national economy. More share of capital income does not lead to more investment, both are rather independent of each other.
  • while inequality has been decreasing from 1960 to 1980, there is a strong increase in income inequality. The upper 10% of the population in 2010 receives 32 to 40% of disposable income and the upper 1% have a share of 9 to 15%.
  • A simple calculation example allows for estimating the order of magnitude of available margins for redistribution: Limiting the medium income of only the group of the upper 1% to four times the average income by redistributive political measures such as more progressive taxes would lead to a potential for redistribution of 5 – 11% of total disposable income.

For very detailed and actual data on worldwide inequality see the World Inequality Report 2022 of the World Inequality Data Base.

Growth, Cycles, Crises and Structural Change

xxx coming soon xxx